Shreyashri Nikhil Phadke v. Nikhil Suhas Phadke
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a family court appeal. Due to paucity of time, the interim application was stood over, with any interim order continuing until the next date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
Any interim order to continue till 22/11/2024; matter stood over.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12941 OF 2024
In
Family Court Appeal 105 OF 2024
Shreyashri Nikhil Phadke ....PETITIONER
V/S
Nikhil Suhas Phadke ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ DATE : 25th October, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 22/11/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shreyashri Nikhil Phadke
- respondent
Nikhil Suhas Phadke
Coram
B.P. Colabawalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
22 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court