Rajesh Pralhad Maindakar v. the Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai.
Bombay HCIA/1269/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Common administrative order: listed matters could not be heard due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; interim orders continue; affidavits to be filed before next date.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT AMIT GAEKWAD GAEKWAD Date: 2024.12.03 10:54:46 +0530
¶2
1 of 2 common order
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶4
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶5
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
¶6
& ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶7
DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2024
¶8
Per Court :-
¶9
- At the time of rising at 4:45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶10
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶11
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Reshu Singh vs Union of India
Rajashri Shahu Chatrapati Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Shirgaon and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary, School Edu. and Sports Dept. and Ors.
Shashi Mishra and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Coast Guard Employees Union a Trade Union Registered vs Union of India through the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence