Dr. Prakash Tukaram Chaphekar and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCIA/10712/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Administrative listing order: matters could not be heard due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks, interim orders to continue, and matters listed on dates in January–February 2025.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT AMIT GAEKWAD GAEKWAD Date: 2024.12.03 10:54:46 +0530
¶2
1 of 2 common order
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶4
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶5
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
¶6
& ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶7
DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2024
¶8
Per Court :-
¶9
- At the time of rising at 4:45 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶10
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶11
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Surekha Rajaram Khot, ( Name After Marriage Surekha Vijay Chavan) vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, and Ors.
Maruti Vithoba Koli vs the Director of Higher Education and Ors.
Chidanand Siddhappa Unnad vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. Its Sec. Social Justice Dept and Ors.
Ninad Shantaram Bhosale vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Dept. and Ors.