First appeal hearing; court noted some documents were in Marathi and requested translated copies, then adjourned the matter part heard to a later date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.12.17 18:50:21 +0530
1 3-FA 1120-24 @ IA 10482-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1120 OF 2024
Arun Ashok Jadhav & Anr. … Appellants Vs. Ravindra Dagadu Gaikwad & Ors. … Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10482 OF 2024
Mr. A. V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w S. B. Deshmukh and Irvin Dsouza for the Appellants.
Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate a/w Ashutosh Kulkarni, Mihir Jaykar i/by Akshay Kulkarni for Respondents Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 to 10.
Mr. Prasad Kulkarni a/w Jyoti Kawade for Respondent Nos.3 to 6.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 17TH DECEMBER 2024
P.C. :
length.
would be useful to have translated copies of the same.
Mugdha
1 of 2
2 3-FA 1120-24 @ IA 10482-24.doc
Hence, stand over to 15th January 2025 at 2.30 p.m. (part heard).
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
2 of 2
Arun Ashok Jadhav & Anr.
Ravindra Dagadu Gaikwad
Respondents Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 to 10
Respondent Nos. 3 to 6
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
