M/S. Alisinghani Transport Pvt.Ltd. through Its Proprietor Pawankumar Kamalasingh Ailsinghani v. Mrs. Lata Balkrishna Patil
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10275 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 35491 OF 2023
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 14/10/2024
None Present
The above numbered Interim Application is listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.
As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dismiss an interim application for non-supply of copies under the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Sangli vs Renuka Ganesh Patil (Renuka Ganpati Chavare) and Ors.
Ms.Gazala Tabassum Dar vs Shreesubh Vuilders Pvt.Ltd.
The Bombay Electric Supply and Transport, Mumbai and Anr. vs Shri Shaikh Mohammed Hanif Mohammed Shafi
Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Reshma Prashant Jadhav and Ors.