Interim application seeking condonation of a 316-day delay in filing a criminal appeal. The court, for the reasons set out in the application, allowed the application and condoned the delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-Ia-1001-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1001 OF 2024 IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 5454 OF 2024
Bhaskar Ramesh Burange .… Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Bhaskar Ramesh Burange .… Appellant Versus State Of Maharashtra .… Respondent
Mr. Akshay Shah, for the Applicant.
Mrs. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATE : 13th MARCH 2024
P.C. :
delay of 316 days caused in filing the aforesaid appeal.
1/2
Chaitanya Jadhav
18-Ia-1001-2024.doc
4. Application stands disposed of.
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
Digitally signed byCHAITANYA CHAITANYA ASHOK ASHOK JADHAV JADHAV Date: 2024.03.16 17:16:51 +0530
2/2
Chaitanya Jadhav
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 316-day delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Bhaskar Ramesh Burange
State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
Manjusha Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
