Adjournment order in a first appeal. Counsel for the insurance company appeared through video conferencing stating he lacked access to his papers; the court adjourned the matter to a later date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-fa-98-2024.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2024
Namdev Vishnupant Shinde and anr.
… Appellants
versus
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited …. Respondents and anr.
Mr. Yuvraj P. Narvankar, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr. Devendranath S. Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent-Insurance Company (through VC).
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 8th JULY, 2024.
P.C. :
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2024.07.10 10:42:04 +0530
1/1
Namdev Vishnupant Shinde
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
