Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Raigad v. Kritofar Thomas Goams and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Registrar's office order recording that substituted service on respondent No. 3 by pasting notice at his locked premises be treated as good service under Order V Rule 17 CPC.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 961 OF 2024
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 13/11/2024
None Present
The office remark shows that notice issued to respondent No. 3 on 12.08.2024 is returned with Bailiff’s remark dt. 26.09.2024 “At the time of service, the respondent No. 3 was not found and his house was locked. Therefore, as per Hon’ble Court’s order, notices were pasted on the conspicuous part of the doors”. The report below notice is on the affidavit of concerned bailiff.
Hence, service of notice upon respondent No. 3 be treated as good service vide Order V Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)
sat-R(J-II)-13.11.2024
Coram
S. R. Agrawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court