Appellant sought to withdraw appeal as per State Government policy against challenging compensation awards enhanced less than four times in rural areas. Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the present appeal granted. Appeal disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
216-FA-602-2001.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 602 OF 2001
Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANTANU SHANKARSA SHANKARSA DHUDUM DHUDUM Date: 2024.07.09 15:06:16 +0530
The State Of Maharashtra
Versus
…. Appellant
Uttareshwar Ganu Andhalker …. Respondent
Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP, Advocate for the Appellant-State. None present for the Respondent.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 4th JULY, 2024.
P.C. :
the SLAO of Rs.18,000/- for compensation, which is enhanced by the reference Court to Rs.35,000/-.
1/2
216-FA-602-2001.doc
Shantanu Dhudum
times in the rural area and the less than two times in the urban areas. The policy is also applicable to the pending references. Hence, in the instant case, the enhancement is less than four times by the reference Court the same would be covered within the above noted notifications.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the State Government is permitted to withdraw the appeal after adopting a policy against challenging lower compensation awards.
The State Of Maharashtra
Uttareshwar Ganu Andhalker
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
