State appealed against Reference Court's enhancement of land acquisition compensation from Rs.6307 to Rs.28,000. The High Court declined to entertain the appeal given the meagre amount and dismissed it without deciding merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
921-fa-1424-2003.doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1424 OF 2003
The State of Maharashtra
… Appellant
versus
Sonu Rama Sangare …. Respondents
Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for the Appellants. None for the Respondent/s.
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 4th JULY, 2024.
P.C. :
will have no bearing on other appeals where the quantum of compensation granted is large.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHUBHADA SHANKAR SHANKAR KADAM KADAM Date: 2024.07.05 17:45:58 +0530
1/1
The State of Maharashtra
Sonu Rama Sangare
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
