Disposed

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd. Thr. Its Authorized Representative Hemant Bhosale v. Ravindra Ramchandra Lahoti and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Jun 2024FA/581/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First appeal listed before Registrar for failure to supply copies for issuing notices despite four weeks' time. One final opportunity granted; two weeks given to supply copies, failing which appeal to stand dismissed against respondents 1, 2 and 4 without further reference.

What the court decided

AI extract

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd. Thr… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

FIRST APPEAL NO. 581 OF 2024

¶3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 04/07/2024

¶6

None Present

¶7

The above numbered First Appeal is listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4.

¶8

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶9

As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Appellant has not taken any steps. However,

¶10

instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶11

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the First Appeal would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, notice returnable date be extended for ten weeks

¶12

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶13

sat-R(J-II)-04.07.2024

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd. Thr. Its Authorized Representative Hemant Bhosale v. Ravindra Ramchandra Lahoti and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd. Thr. Its Authorized Representative Hemant Bhosale v. Ravindra Ramchandra Lahoti and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Renu Mohanlal Kukreja (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Ravi Mohanlal Kukreja, Thr. C.A. Jayesh R. Patel vs New India Bearing and Belting House and Anr.

United India Insurance Company Limited vs Mr.Ishwara Shankar Kamble and Ors.

Smt. Renu Mohanlal Kukreja (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Mr. Ravi Mohanlal Kukreja, Thr. C.A. J. R. Patel vs M/S. Laxmi Engineering Co. and Ors.

Shri. Balu Shamu Gurav and Ors. vs Shri. Bapusaheb Rama Gurav and Ors.

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd. Thr. Its Authorized Representative Hemant Bhosale vs Khalil Abu Atar and Ors.

Shri Satu Biru Dhangar (Deceased) through Is Lrs. 1.1)APPASO Satu Dhangar to 1.3 vs State of Maharashtra through) Special Land Acquisition Officer NO.6, Kolhapur