Disposed

Managing Director, Karnataka S.T. Corporation v. Sou. Suvarna Kallappa Jalwadi and Anr.

Bombay HC23 Jan 2024FA/55/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registrar's procedural order in a first appeal where the appellant failed to supply copies for issuing notices despite four weeks' time. Citing Chapter VII Rule 2(iii) of the Appellate Side Rules, the Registrar granted a final two weeks to supply copies, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed as against respondents Nos. 1 and 2.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks' final time granted to appellant to supply copies for notices; failing which appeal to stand dismissed against respondents 1 and 2 automatically.

Managing Director, Karnataka S.T. Corporation… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

FIRST APPEAL NO. 55 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 19/04/2024

¶6

None present

¶7

The above numbered Civil Application is listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

¶8

Here reference to Chapter VII of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 [for short “Rules”] may be conveniently made. It states about Processes, Process fees, Printing charges, Security for costs and other procedure after admission etc.

¶9

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and

¶10

the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶11

The prescribed time to supply copies provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶12

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the First Appeal would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 without further reference to the Court of Registrar.

¶13

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶14

sat-R(J-II)-19.04.2024

Managing Director, Karnataka S.T. Corporation v. Sou. Suvarna Kallappa Jalwadi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Managing Director, Karnataka S.T. Corporation v. Sou. Suvarna Kallappa Jalwadi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mr. Prashant Shah Vs Mohammed Shabbir Hyder Ali Sayed and Anr.

Subhadeep Pritis Sarkar vs Pallabi Dutt Sarkar

Union of India Thr. Senior Superintendent of Post Office Sangli Vs Radhabai Damodhar Kanitkar and Ors.

United India Insurance Company Limited vs Mr.Ishwara Shankar Kamble and Ors.

Smt. Yashoda Dinkar Patil vs Shri Subhash Dnyandev Shinde and Anr.

Prathamesh Deepak Ambukar Vs Aditi Prathamesh Ambukar Thr.Vinod Kashinath Narvankar