Prakash Arjun Agdekar v. Mumbai International Airports Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A bare procedural order: the Court noted the appellants' Senior Counsel had to leave due to a personal exigency and continued earlier statements made in Court until the next date. No substantive decision of general application.
What the court decided
1 2-REVN-98-15.doc-FA-1843-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed URMILA by URMILAPRAMOD PRAMOD INGALE INGALE Date:2024.12.21 13:44:42 +0530
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1843 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12857 OF 2024
Shilpi Minz ...Appellant
Vs.
Mumbai International Airport Ltd., Mumbai & Ors. ...Respondents
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1931 OF 2024
WITH
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shilpi Minz
- respondent
Mumbai International Airport Ltd., Mumbai
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Cosmopolitaniii Cooperative Housing Society Limited vs Honble Minister Co-Operation Marketin Government of Maharashtra
Sushil Bansi Jadhav and Anr. vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Kamalbai Dattatray Dokade and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Superintendent of Land Records Solapur and Anr.
Asian Paints Limited vs Reena Devi Jain Trading as Jvs Paints and Chemicals