Vijay Shamrao Chopade and Anr. v. Abhishek Shivanand Belwalkar
Case brief
What is this about?
First Appeal No. 191 of 2024 listed for failure of the appellant to supply copies for notice despite prior four weeks' time. The Registrar granted a final three weeks to supply copies, failing which the appeal would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 to 3 without further reference.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 191 OF 2024
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 01/08/2024
None Present
The above numbered First Appeal is listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.
As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Appellant has not taken any steps. However,
Coram
S. R. Agrawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shiva Hari Patil vs Ambaji Bapuso Patil and Anr.
The Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation through Thr.the Executive Engineer vs Sitaram Dagadu Pavagi and Ors.
Konkan Railway Corporation Limited and 2 Ors. vs Pan India Engineering and Construction Company P Ltd.
Jayadabi Ayub Kazi vs Ashok Babasaheb Mate and Anr.