Krishna Dhondiram Pawar v. Dilip Dinkar Shelar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A registrar noted that notices for the respondents had been supplied to serve them regarding the present appeal, in which case the return date of notices was extended by 10 weeks.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1837 OF 2024
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
CORAM : SHRI S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)
DATE : 19/12/2024
Adv. Moksh Jain i/by Adv. R. V. L. Sankpal present for the Appellant
The learned advocate for the appellant submitted that today, he has supplied copies in the department for issuing notices to respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Office to verify and if it is supplied, notices returnable date be extended by 10 weeks.
Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)
sat-R(J-II)-19.12.2024
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Kitabullah Khan vs the Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Cholamandalam Ms Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. vs Sangita Macchindra Gulave and Ors.
Shekhar Bhaguram Shirke vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
National Insurance Company Limited Thr. Mumbai Regional Office vs Sangita Chandrakant Lengare and Ors.