Disposed

Icici Lombard Insurance Company, Ahmednagar v. Suhas Santosh Bhosale(Minor)Thr.His Mother RES.NO.2 Manisha Santosh Bhosale and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Mar 2024FA/167/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First Appeal listed before Registrar (Judl-II) for failure to supply copies for issuing notice to Respondent No. 5. Citing Chapter VII Rule 2(iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final two weeks to supply copies; on failure the appeal will stand dismissed against Respondent No. 5.

What the court decided

AI extract

Icici Lombard Insurance Company, Ahmednagar vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

FIRST APPEAL NO. 167 OF 2024

¶3

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s order appearance, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders

¶4

CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II)

¶5

DATE : 21/03/2024

¶6

None present

¶7

The above numbered First Appeal is listed for third time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already four weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing Notice to the Respondent No. 5.

¶8

Here reference to Chapter VII of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 [for short “Rules”] may be conveniently made. It states about Processes, Process fees, Printing charges, Security for costs and other procedure after admission etc.

¶9

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies – immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and

¶10

the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.

¶11

The prescribed time to supply copies provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Appellant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

¶12

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to supply necessary copies without fail. On failure, the First Appeal will stand dismissed against Respondent No. 5 without further reference to the Court of Registrar.

¶13

Sd/REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)

¶14

sat-R(J-II)-21.03.2024

Icici Lombard Insurance Company, Ahmednagar v. Suhas Santosh Bhosale(Minor)Thr.His Mother RES.NO.2 Manisha Santosh Bhosale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Icici Lombard Insurance Company, Ahmednagar v. Suhas Santosh Bhosale(Minor)Thr.His Mother RES.NO.2 Manisha Santosh Bhosale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Thr. Legal Hub vs Smt. Sakhubai Pandurang Chavan and Ors.

Mr. Abbas Murad Kadegaonkar vs Smt. Kamal Dhulappa @ Dhulsiddha Ranage and Ors.

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Thr. Its Divisional Manager,Kolhapur vs Shri. Santosh Vasantrao Surve and Ors.

Vikrant Hukumchand Bhalani vs Madhuri Mahendrakumar Bhalani (Dec.)and Ors.

Jagannath D. Jagtap(Decd.Thr.Lrs) Shakuntala Alias Sakhubai J. Jagtap(Decd.) Sunil J. Jagtap Vs Shivaji Shankar Jagtap (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Lilabai Shivaji Jagtap and Ors.

Jaganath D. Jagtap(Decd.Thr.Lrs) Shakuntal Alias S. J. Jagtap(Decd) Sunil J. Jagtap Vs Shivaji Shankar Jagtap (Decd.Thr. Lrs) Lilabai Shivaji Jagtap and Ors.