Application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondent was not pressed by the applicant since the trial had already commenced; the application was accordingly disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-GOA:1426
CRMAM 5 of 2021
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL APPLICATION ( MAIN ) NO.5 OF 2021
STATE OF GOA, THR. P.I., PERNEM POLICE STAITON, PERNEM ... APPLICANT Versus RUSHIKESH KERKAR ... RESPONDENT
Mr S. G. Bhobe, Advocate for the applicant.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 27th August, 2024
P.C.
Heard Mr Bhobe, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr Desai learned Counsel for the respondent. Though present application was filed for cancellation of bail granted to the respondent no.1, Mr Bhobe submits that trial has already commenced and present application was filed in the year 2021. Therefore, Petitioner is not pressing for the present application.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Page 1 of 1
27th August, 2024
State of Goa, thr. P.I., Pernem Police Station, Pernem
Rushikesh Kerkar
Bharat P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
