Allowed

Shekhar Vishwanath Dhond, Thr. Next Friend Riddesh Mahesh Sukhtankar v. Dayanand Urban Cooperative Credit Society Ltd.,Rep. by Its Br. Manager, Nitesh Narayan Naik and Anr.

Bombay HC29 Apr 2024CRIR/3/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compounded a cheque dishonour offence under Section 147 NI Act upon deposit of 15% of the cheque amount and withdrawal of prior deposits. Quashed conviction orders.

What did the court decide?

Permission to compound offence granted on deposit of 15% cheque amount; conviction orders quashed.

What the court decided

Shekhar Vishwanath Dhond, Thr. Next Friend Riddesh Mahesh… — Cheque Dishonour | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

CRIR 3 of 2024

¶2

Meena

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2024 WITH CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2024

¶4

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2024 SHEKHAR VISHWANATH DHOND, THR. NEXT FRIEND RIDDESH MAHESH SUKHTANKAR ... APPLICANT

¶5

Versus DAYANAND URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,REP. BY ITS BR. MANAGER, NITESH NARAYAN NAIK AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS

¶6

WITH CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2024 SHEKHAR VISHWANATH DHOND, THR. RIDDESH MAHESH SUKHTANKAR ... APPLICANT Versus DAYANAND URBAN COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,REP. BY ITS BR. MANAGER, NITESH NARAYAN NAIK AND ANR ... RESPONDENTS

¶7

Mr. A.D. Bhobe with Ms. Shaizeen Shaikh, Advocates for the Applicant.

¶8

Mr. Omkar Parab h/f. Mr. Jatin Ramaiya, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Gaurish Nagvenker, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.2.

¶9

CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED :- 29th April, 2024

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

Mr. Bhobe appears for the applicant and Mr. Omkar Parab appears for respondent No.1 - society and Mr. G. Nagvenkar, learned

Page 1 of 3

29th April, 2024

CRIR 3 of 2024

Additional Public Prosecutor appears for the State.

¶16

The application is filed for compounding of the offence since the entire amount is deposited with this Court as well as the Sessions Court.

¶17

The learned Counsel for the respondent- Society admits that the entire amount is deposited however he prays that the amount deposited before this Court as well as the Sessions Court be allowed to be withdrawn.

¶18

Mr. Bhobe appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready and willing to pay 15% of the cheque amount i.e. Rs.19,207/- as per the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs Sayed Babalal H [2010 (5) SCC 663], today itself.

¶19

The learned Counsel for the Society submits that the said society be allowed to withdraw the entire amount deposited by the applicant in this Court as well as before the First Appellate Court. The learned Counsel for the Society on this assurance gave no objection for the compounding of the offences.

¶20

Accordingly, the application stands allowed. Permission granted to compound the offence as provided under Section 147 of the N.I. Act, on deposit of 15% of the cheque amount with the Goa State Legal

Page 2 of 3

29th April, 2024

CRIR 3 of 2024

Services Authority today itself. Once such amount is deposited, the application for compounding shall stand allowed thereby quashed and set aside the orders of conviction passed by the Trial Court and confirmed by the First Appellate Court.

¶25

The Registry to exchange the cheque amount in the name of the Goa State Legal Services Authority towards 15% i.e. Rs.19,207/- . Similarly, respondent No.1- Society is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by the applicant in this Court as well as before the First Appellate Court.

¶26

Proceedings stand disposed of in the above terms.

¶27

BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.

¶28

Digitally signed by MEENA MEENA VISHAL BHOIR VISHAL BHOIR Date: 2024.04.29 16:27:42 +05'30'

¶29

Page 3 of 3

¶30

29th April, 2024

Shekhar Vishwanath Dhond, Thr. Next Friend Riddesh Mahesh Sukhtankar v. Dayanand Urban Cooperative Credit Society Ltd.,Rep. by Its Br. Manager, Nitesh Narayan Naik and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Shekhar Vishwanath Dhond, Thr. Next Friend Riddesh Mahesh Sukhtankar v. Dayanand Urban Cooperative Credit Society Ltd.,Rep. by Its Br. Manager, Nitesh Narayan Naik and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eurico Mascarenhas and Anr. Vs State of Goa, Thr. Chief Secretary, and 5 Ors.

Farid Veljee Vs Nurallah Kamruddin Veljee (Presently in Custody at Colvale Central Jail, Colvale) and Anr.

Farid Veljee Vs Nurallah Kamruddin Veljee (Presently in Custody at Covale Central Jail, Colvale) and Anr.

Dinesh M. Presently in Judicial Custody, Colvale Central Jail, Colvale Vs State of Goa through Officer Incharge P. I. Konkan Railway Police Station and Anr.

Dayanand Narvekar and 11 Ors. Vs State Thr. Police Inspector, Mapusa Police Station and 2 Ors.

Pandurang Madhukar Narvekar Thr. Next Friend Parag Narvekar vs Raghunath Nilu Gauns Dessai and Anr.