A single judge of the High Court of Bombay at Goa condoned a 28-day delay in filing a revision application challenging a Registrar order that refused to register a writ petition. The application stands disposed of.
Condonation of a 28-day delay in filing the revision application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MCA 172 of 2024
Esha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO.172 OF 2024
EURICO MASCARENHAS AND ANR ... APPLICANTS Versus STATE OF GOA, THR. CHIEF SECRETARY, AND 5 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Mr. Jose Reis, Advocate for the Applicants.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED :- 25th April, 2024
P.C.
Heard Mr. Jose Reis for the Applicants.
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
ESHA SAINATH Digitally signed by ESHA SAINATH VAIGANKAR VAIGANKAR Date: 2024.04.25 19:05:14 +05'30'
Page 1 of 1
25th April, 2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 28 days in filing a revision application.
EURICO MASCARENHAS
STATE OF GOA
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
