On an agreement where the second party unconditionally agreed to withdraw the second appeal, the High Court permitted the withdrawal and closed the proceedings in Second Appeal No. 86 of 2011.
Permitted the withdrawal of the Second Appeal and closed the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-GOA:941
SA 86 of 2011
vinita
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
SECOND APPEAL NO.86 OF 2011
DR. AJAY GOVIND KUDCHADKAR Versus BHASKAR PRABHAKAR RIVONKAR AND ANR.,
... APPELLANTS
... RESPONDENTS
Mr P. Talaulikar, Advocate for the appellant.
CORAM:- BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED :- 14th June, 2024
P.C.
Heard Mr P. Talaulikar, learned counsel for the appellant. None present for the respondents.
"That the Second Party have preferred a second appeal before the honourable High Court and in view of the present agreement Second Party shall withdraw the second appeal before honourable High Court unconditionally."
Page 1 of 2
14th June, 2024
SA 86 of 2011
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, J.
Signed by: VINITA VIKAS NAIK Designation: Personal Assistant Date: 14/06/2024 16:59:22
Page 2 of 2
14th June, 2024
DR. AJAY GOVIND KUDCHADKAR
BHASKAR PRABHAKAR RIVONKAR
BHARAT P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
