Shri. Rajendra Baban Pangare v. Shri Sagar Balu Gole and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision against the rejection of a preliminary objection that a fresh suit is barred by Order XXIII Rule 4(b) CPC and Section 10 CPC. Court stands the matter for hearing on arguments.
What the court decided
1 CRA 572 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 572 OF 2024
Rajendra Baban Pangare … Applicant
Versus
Sagar Balu Gole and Ors. … Respondents
*****
| Mr. Drupad Patil a/w. Mr. Prasad Keluskar :- |
Advocates | for | Applicant. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr. Amit Gharte :- | Advocate and 2. |
for | Respondents No.1 |
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE : 18th DECEMBER 2024
P. C. :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a fresh suit is barred under Order XXI Rule 4(b) CPC if the earlier suit was withdrawn without leave of the court.
Whether the bar under Order XXI Rule 4(b) CPC falls within the purview of 'suit barred by any law'.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rajendra Baban Pangare
- respondent
Sagar Balu Gole
Coram
S. M. Modak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mr. Bhupendra Onkarrao Lohkpure and Another vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another
Swacchanad Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Majiwade V.V.C.H.S. Ltd. and Anr. vs Nanda Balasaheb Shinde and Ors.
Suresh Kumar Pathak vs Union of India, Thr. Army Area Commandant and Another
Shri.Santosh Mahadeo Aldar Vs Ravindar Yashwantrao Deshmukh