Both Civil Revision Applications stand disposed of as compliance with prior directions was established by the parties. Any pending interim applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.cra.521.2022.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Revision Application NO. 521 OF 2022
Satara Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Grahak Sangh Maryadit, Thr. Chairman, Satara Z M S G S Maryadit ...Applicant Versus Prathamik Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd. Thr. Chairman P. S. S. Bank Ltd. Thr. R. B. Ghorpade And Anr. ...Respondent
WITH
Civil Revision Application NO. 522 OF 2022
Satara Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Grahak Sangh Maryadit, Thr. Chairman S.z.m.s. G. S. Maryadit ...Applicant Versus Prathamik Shikshak Sahkari Bank Ltd. Thr. Chairman R. B. Ghorpade And Anr ...Respondent
Adv. V. S. Talkute for the Applicant in both. Adv. Dilip Bodake for Respondent/Bank in both CRA.
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 2 MAY 2024
P.C.:
1
Amol D. Nawale
3.cra.521.2022.doc
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
2
Amol D. Nawale
Satara Zilla Madhyavarti Sahakari Grahak Sangh Maryadit
Prathamik Shikshak Sahakari Bank Ltd.
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
