Disposed

Dr. Nandkumar Shankar Gaikwad v. M/S. Panvel Medical Research Centre

Bombay HC30 Apr 2024WP/1814/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Licensor challenged a revisional order remanding his leave-and-licence matter to the Competent Authority. Counsel agreed the impugned order should be quashed; the Court set it aside and directed fresh hearing of Revision Application No. 315 of 2018 within six months.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 26 July 2018 quashed; revision application to be heard afresh and expedited, ideally disposed within six months.

Dr. Nandkumar Shankar Gaikwad Vs M/S. Panvel Medical… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

KVM

¶2

1/4

¶3

922 - WP 1814 OF 2019.doc

¶4

Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.05.04 15:10:50 +0530

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶6

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 1814 OF 2019

¶8

Dr. Nandkumar Shankar Gaikwad ….. Petitioner

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

M/S. Panvel Medical Research Centre .….. Respondent

¶11

Mr. Dilip Bodake for the Petitioner.

¶12

Mr.Shardul Singh (Thr. Video Conference) a/w. Mr.Preet Chedda, Ms.Sayali Sawant for the Respondent.

¶13

CORAM: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

¶14

DATE : 30 APRIL, 2024

¶15

P.C. :-

¶16

This writ petition is filed by the licensor challenging an

¶17

order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division, under section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

¶18

By the impugned judgment and order passed by the

¶19

additional commissioner, konkan division, revision application was allowed and the matter was remanded back to the Competent Authority for a fresh hearing.

¶20

KVM

¶21

2/4

¶22

922 - WP 1814 OF 2019.doc

¶23

I have heard learned counsel for both the parties, with their help, i have gone through the documents on record including the impugned order passed by the Revisional Authority.

¶24

In the findings, the Revisional Authority has come to the

¶25

conclusion that the leave and licence agreement is not a registered document. Infact, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has shown me the leave and licence agreement and from the photocopy, which is attached to the petition, it can be seen that the leave and licence agreement is a registered document.

¶26

After the matter was argued for some time, both the learned counsel agree that the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division by the impugned order dated 26 July, 2018 be quashed and set aside and the matter can be heard fresh by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division.

¶27

3/4

¶28

KVM

¶29

922 - WP 1814 OF 2019.doc

¶30

Writ petition is disposed of with following directions :-

¶31

(a) The impugned order dated 26 July, 2018 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division is hereby quashed and set aside.

¶32

(b) The Revision Applicatioin No. 315 of 2018 be taken back on the file and the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division should hear the parties afresh.

¶33

¶34

(d) The Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division should make an endevour to dispose of

¶35

the revision application within a period of six months from today.

¶36

KVM

¶37

922 - WP 1814 OF 2019.doc

¶38

(e) The parties are permitted to file additional

¶39

documents on record within a period of six weeks

¶40

from today.

¶41

(f) All contentions of both the parties are kept

¶42

open.

¶43

The parties to act on the authenticated copy of this

¶44

order.

¶45

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]

Dr. Nandkumar Shankar Gaikwad v. M/S. Panvel Medical Research Centre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Nandkumar Shankar Gaikwad v. M/S. Panvel Medical Research Centre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Astor Homi Ghandhy Vs Funds and Properties of the Parsi Panchayet Bombay and Ors.

Atul Kaluram Mehta Vs Dattatraya Ganpat Bhosale Since Deceased Throu. Legal Heirs and Ors.

Vidya Sahakari Bank through CEO Subhash N Deodhar Vs Shri. Nemichand Fulchand Karnavat

Daryus Soley Panthakey Vs Ketan Manmohan Desai

Mahadev Shrirang Ghadage vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Mahadev Shrirang Ghadage vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.