A writ petition concerning a deceased party's legal representatives was argued briefly before counsel for the petitioner sought liberty to withdraw it on instructions. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, deciding nothing of substance.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9089-wp-3625 of 2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3625 OF 2024
NIKITA KAILAS DARADE
Arun Popatlal Shah since deceased Through LRS ...Petitioner Versus Rukmini Ramvilas Lahoti and Ors. ...Respondent
Digitally signed by NIKITA KAILAS DARADE Date: 2024.03.13 11:13:39 +0630
____________________________________ Mr. Yogesh Patil, for the petitioner. Mr. Drupad Patil i/b B. G. Ligade for the Respondent.
____________________________________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : 12 MARCH 2024
P.C.:
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1
Nikita
NIKITA KAILAS DARADE
Arun Popatlal Shah since deceased Through LRS
Rukmini Ramvilas Lahoti
RAJESH S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
