Applicant sought leave to withdraw a civil revision application with liberty to raise the contention of proper valuation of the suit. The High Court allowed withdrawal as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1- 34.CRA.36.2024.odt
2024:BHC-NAG:6338
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2024
Tarachand S/o. Namdeorao Shelke
Vs.
Sunita Wd/o. Tulshiram Shelke & Ors.
********************************************************************************************** Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
********************************************************************************************** Mr. B.W. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J. DATED : 21st JUNE, 2024.
. Learned advocate for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to raise the contention and establish it with regard to the proper valuation of the suit by by the plaintiff.
(G. A. SANAP, J.)
Vijay
Signed by: Mr. Vijay Kumar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 21/06/2024 16:20:41
Tarachand S/o. Namdeorao Shelke
Sunita Wd/o. Tulshiram Shelke
G. A. SANAP
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
