Ramchandra Damodar Ahire v. the Tahsildar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant sought relief from a notice scheduling implementation of orders carving a road through his property. Noting two concurrent Exhibit '5' injunction rejections and an appellate District Court order that merely translated the Trial Court order, the Court stayed the impending action, restrained coercive steps, and required affidavits and replies.
What did the court decide?
Notice dated 10.06.2024 for impending road-establishment action stayed; Respondents Nos.1–5 directed not to take coercive steps on 19.06.2024.
What the court decided
17.cra.316.24.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 316 OF 2024
Ramchandra Damodar Ahire Applicant .. (Orig. Plaintiff)
Versus
Tahsildar and Ors. .. Respondents
- Mr. Khushnood Akhtar a/w. Mr. Vinay Kanodia and Mr. Bhikaji R. Palav, Advocates i/by MR. Shivaji Nirmale for the Applicant.
- Mr. Sanjay P. Shinde, Advocate for Respondent Nos.6 to 19.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : JUNE 18, 2024.
P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Akhtar, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notice dated 10.06.2024 directing road establishment through the Applicant's property should be stayed pending review of concurrent injunction orders.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ramchandra Damodar Ahire
- respondent
Tahsildar
- respondent
Respondent Nos. 6 to 19 (private respondents)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court