Civil Revision Application listed before the Registrar for default in supplying copies for notice despite four weeks' time. One final two-week opportunity was granted to supply copies, failing which the application would stand dismissed without further reference.
Two weeks' time granted to supply copies; dismissal on failure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.286 OF 2024
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II) DATE : 16thOctober, 2024 None Present. The above numbered Civil Revision |
|
| Application is listed on the board of | |
| Registrar third time. Already, four weeks | |
| time has been granted, however, despite granting four weeks time, the Advocate for the Appellant has not supplied copies for issuing notice to the Respondents till date. |
|
| Here reference to Chapter VII of the | |
| Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, | |
| 1960 (for short “Rules”) may be | |
| conveniently made. It states about |
|
| processes, process fees, printing charges, security for costs and other procedure after admission etc. |
|
| In view of provisions under Chapter VII | |
| Rule 2(iii) matters to be dismissed for non- |
prosecution in case of default of payment of process fees and failure to supply copies immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule of the supply of copies, the office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute.
As such, the prescribed time to supply copies as provided under Rules 1960 has been expired. 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to supply the necessary copies.
In turn, 02 (two) weeks time is granted (excluding Diwali Vacation) with directions to supply the necessary copies without fail. On failure, Civil Revision Application would stand dismissed against Respondents without further reference to the court of Registrar.
sd/Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Application should be dismissed for failure to supply copies within prescribed time under the 1960 Rules.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Appellant
Respondents
S.R. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
