Bharti Mahesh Arya v. Anagha Hitesh Arya
Bombay HCCRA/222/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Registrar's order in a civil revision application directing the applicant's advocate to remove office objections within two weeks.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.222 OF 2024
¶4
| Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders |
Court’s or Judge’s orders |
|---|---|
| CORAM :S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL.-II) |
|
| DATE : 16thApril, 2024 | |
| None Present. | |
| The learned Advocate for Applicant is | |
| directed to remove the office objection | |
| within 02 (two) weeks. | |
| sd/- Registrar (Judl. - II) dsm |
Coram
AI extract
S.R. AGRAWAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mrs. Archana Yogeshwar Kansare vs the State of Maharashtra, Rural Development Minister, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.
Dhananjay S/O Tukaram Bhalchakra vs Murtaja Ahemad S/O Shafik Ahemad
Tirthankar Superspeciality Hospital, Akola and Others vs Mr. Manzoor Hussain Nadeem, Akola
Shakuntalabai W/O Shrikant Jaiswal Thr. P.O.a., Holder, Prashant Shrikant Jaiswal and Another vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Dept. of Excise and Prohibition, Mumbai and Another