Shreepad Balkrishna Thithe v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition arising from a first appeal. An interim application filed by respondent nos. 5 and 6 was not on the board; parties sought time to reply. The court adjourned the matter to 23 April 2024, deciding nothing on merits.
What the court decided
1 49-CP-76-2024.doc
Digitally signed by WAKLE WAKLE MANOJ MANOJ JANARDHAN JANARDHAN Date: 2024.03.28 09:24:05 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.76 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.102 OF 2007
Shreepad Balkrishna Thithe : Petitioner
Vs.
Mr. Iqbal I. Chahal
The Municipal Commissioner & Ors. : Respondents
Adv. Gireesh U. G. Menon, for the Petitioner.
Adv. Uma Palsule/Desai a/w Adv. Santosh Parad, for the Respondent/MCGM.
Mr. A. R. Metkari, AGP for the State.
Adv. Rajesh A. Ravankar, for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shreepad Balkrishna Thithe
- respondent
Iqbal I. Chahal, The Municipal Commissioner & Ors.
Coram
Kishore C. Sant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court