Jaysingh Kisan Gardare v. the Sub Divisional Officer Baramati
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitions against the Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati, filed by multiple petitioners, were adjourned. The State contended no contempt was committed and sought time to file reply affidavits within three weeks.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JPP
- CP 59.24 with connected.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2024
Shrirang Devram Gadadare … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2024
Sunil Kisan Gardare … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2024
Sonaba Gangaram Khaladkar … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shrirang Devram Gadadare
- petitioner
Sunil Kisan Gardare
- petitioner
Sonaba Gangaram Khaladkar
- petitioner
Parvatibai Dnyanoba Lavange
- petitioner
Jaysingh Kisan Gardare
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri Dhananjay Vasudev Sawant and Anr. vs the Competent Authority Land Acquistion and Sub Divisional Officer and Anr.
Nisha Chanika Prasad Patel vs the Union of India
Seabird Distriparks (Krishnapatnam) Ltd. vs Union of India, Thorouh Secretary, Ministry of Finance Dept.
Goldie Sud vs the Commissioner of Customs Passenger Arrivals