Contempt petitions against the Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati, listed together. The State contended no contempt was committed and sought time to file reply affidavits. The court granted three weeks to file replies and adjourned the matters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
JPP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2024
Shrirang Devram Gadadare … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 10 OF 2024
Sunil Kisan Gardare … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2024
Sonaba Gangaram Khaladkar … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 63 OF 2024
Parvatibai Dnyanoba Lavange (deceased) … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 65 OF 2024
Jaysingh Kisan Gardare … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent with
JPP
2
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 68 OF 2024
Babanrao Vithoba Pingale (deceased) … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 60 OF 2024
Kaluram Gujaba Gaddare … Petitioner V/s.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 62 OF 2024
Rajaram Balu Kullal (deceased) … Petitioner V/s.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 5 OF 2024
Shripati Bhiva Thakar (deceased) … Petitioner V/s.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 6 OF 2024
Vithoba Ravaji Jadhav (deceased) … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 7 OF 2024
JPP 3 4. CP 59.24 with connected.doc Baban Bahiru Londhe … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 8 OF 2024
Vaman Bala Bande … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 9 OF 2024
Shivaji Baban Pingle … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati ... Respondent
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 67 OF 2024
Dagadu Maruti Gaikwad (Deceased) … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati & Ors. ... Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 64 OF 2024 Paraji Tulashiram Kullal (deceased) … Petitioner V/s. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati & Ors. ... Respondents
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 66 OF 2024
Kerba Kondiba Pingale (deceased) … Petitioner V/s.
JPP
4 4. CP 59.24 with connected.doc
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati & Ors. ... Respondents
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 61 OF 2024
Mahadeo Nama Pangarkar (deceased) … Petitioner V/s.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati & Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. R.N. Gite with Mr. Rohit D. Gorade and Sushant Tare for the Petitioners
Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl.G.P. with Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP for the Respondent – State in CP 9/24 and others
Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl. G.P. with Ms. N.M. Mehra, AGP for Respondent – State in CP 59/24
Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl.G.P. with Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent – State in CP 6/24
Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl.G.P. with Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent – State in CP 8/24
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 23 JANUARY 2024
P.C. :-
The learned AGP states that according to the State Government there is no contempt committed and seeks time to file reply affidavit in all these Petitions. Reply to be filed within a period of three weeks.
M.M. SATHAYE, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Digitally signed JYOTI by JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date: 2024.01.24 14:45:36 +0530
Shrirang Devram Gadadare
Sunil Kisan Gardare
Sonaba Gangaram Khaladkar
Parvatibai Dnyanoba Lavange (deceased)
Jaysingh Kisan Gardare
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Baramati
Nitin Jamdar
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
