Contempt petition alleging non-implementation of a writ judgment reinstating the petitioner. The Government tendered an order dated 19 December 2024 confirming reinstatement, which was taken on record; the court disposed of the contempt petition as its purpose stood served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.608 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.904 OF 2024
Taramati Santosh Taji .. Petitioner
Vs. Vikas Chandra Rastogi and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Nitin Gaware Patil, i/by Mr. Divyesh K. Jain, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. N.C. Walimbe, Additional Government Pleader with Mr. S.P. Kamble, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra.
CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR &
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 20TH DECEMBER 2024.
P.C. :
Digitally signed by SNEHA SNEHA ABHAY 905-CP-608-2024.doc ABHAY DIXIT Dixit DIXIT Date: 2024.12.20 16:44:10 +0530
1/1
Taramati Santosh Taji
Vikas Chandra Rastogi
A.S. Chandurkar
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
