Kapil Prakash Deshmukh v. Smt. Sunanda Wakhare
Bombay HCCP/596/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Listing order: matters could not be heard due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks, affidavits filed before next date, and interim orders continued; matters listed on dates in January 2025.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Nikita .. 1 .. COMMON ORDER
¶2
NIKITAKAILASDARADE
¶3
Digitally signed byNIKITA KAILASDARADEDate: 2024.12.0311:07:16 +0530
¶4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶5
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
¶6
&
¶7
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
¶8
DATE :- 28th NOVEMBER, 2024
¶9
Per Court :-
¶10
- At the time of rising at 5.10 pm, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
¶11
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
¶12
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
Coram
AI extract
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Prathamesh Nayan Mulye vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Dept of Education and Ors.
Sumitra Mallikarjun Pujari Nee Sumitra Rajendra Birajdar vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretry School Education and Sports and Ors.
Mangat Mandip Kaur Manjit Singh vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Ajit Shankar Dhirde vs State of Maharashtra through the Secretary Education Department (Secondary)