Petitioner dropped connected contempt petition as the underlying revision application was already adjudicated. Court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
Petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:19893
24cp506-22
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.506 OF 2022
Subhash Ramnath Pandey ... Petitioner. Versus
Madhu Subhash Pandey and Anr. ... Respondents.
Ms. Poonam Ankleshwaria for the Petitioner. Mrs. Taubon F. Irani a/w. Nuzhat Shaikh for the Respondents.
—————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : April 29, 2024.
P. C. :
1. The connected revision application has already been adjudicated. In light of the same, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner does not press the contempt petition. Contempt Petition is disposed of as not pressed.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
sa_mandawgad
1 of 1
Signed by: Sanjay A. Mandawgad Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 30/04/2024 19:41:11
Subhash Ramnath Pandey
Madhu Subhash Pandey
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
