Second appeal concerning suit property; appellant, having purchased the property, sought withdrawal of the appeal as nothing survived for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-SA-739-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.739 OF 2017
Shri.Jagannath Maruti Bagade ...Appellant. Versus Shri.Ganesh Damodhar Pawar ...Respondent.
Adv. Gaurav Ugale i/b Shriram S. Kulkarni, for the Appellant.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : April 26, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Learned counsel for the Appellant on instructions submits that
as the suit property has been purchased by the Appellant, nothing survives for consideration in the Second Appeal.
2. Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
3. In view of disposal of Second Appeal, Civil/Interim Application, if
any, taken out therein does not survives for consideration and stands disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Harish
Jagannath Maruti Bagade
Ganesh Damodhar Pawar
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
