Disposed

Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar v. the Union of India, Thr the Secretary/Chief Engineer, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway and or

Bombay HC3 Jan 2024CP/474/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of a PIL regarding unfinished repair and widening of National Highway-66. Relying on departmental assurances, the court directed completion by December 31, 2024, and made the timeline binding with a contempt warning.

What did the court decide?

Directed that the entire stretch of National Highway-66 including road widening and repair works be completed by 31st December 2024.

Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar Vs the Union of India, Thr the… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed byMUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.01.04 17:23:10 +0530

¶2

1 12-PIL 19-21 @ IA 3427-23 @ CP 474-21.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.19 OF 2021

¶5

Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar … Petitioner Vs. The Union of India & Ors. … Respondents

¶6

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3427 OF 2023 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.19 OF 2021 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.474 OF 2021

¶7

Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar, Petitioner in person.

¶8

Mr. Y. R. Mishra i/by Ms. Anusha Amin for Respondent No.1 in PIL No.19 of 2023.

¶9

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra a/w P. Sonawane for Respondent No.1 in CP No.474 of 2021.

¶10

Mr. Kevic Setalwad, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Rakesh Singh and Ms. Heena Shaikh i/by M. V. Kini & Co. for Respondent No.2 (NHAI).

¶11

Mr. Yashwant Gotakar, Project Director (NHAI) is present.

¶12

Mr. Laxmikant Jadhav, Executive Engineer, N. H. Division, Ratnagiri is present.

¶13

Mr. P. P. Kakade, Government Pleader a/w Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Add. GP a/w Smt. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for the RespondentState.

¶14

1 of 5

¶15

Mugdha

¶16

2 12-PIL 19-21 @ IA 3427-23 @ CP 474-21.doc

¶17

CORAM : DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. & ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

¶18

DATE : 03^rd JANUARY 2024

¶19

P.C. :

¶20

Heard Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar, the Petitioner, who appears in person, Mr. P. P. Kakade, learned Government Pleader representing the Respondent-State and Mr. Kevic Setalwad, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Rakesh Singh representing the National Highways Authority of India.

¶21

This Public Interest Litigation Petition has been filed in respect of the repair and widening of National Highway – 66, which emanates from Panvel and terminates at Sawantwadi. The project of road widening of National Highway-66 was undertaken way back in the year 2011, however even after a period of twelve long years having elapsed, till date the road widening and other repair works are not complete.

¶22

Delay in such infrastructural projects not only cause numerous difficulties to the members of the public, which use

¶23

2 of 5

¶24

Mugdha

¶25

3 12-PIL 19-21 @ IA 3427-23 @ CP 474-21.doc

¶26

such roads, but it ultimately cause burden on the State Exchequer. Any delay in completion of such projects necessarily entails ever rising construction costs, which ultimately is to be borne by the public at large.

¶27

The Affidavit filed by National Highways Authority of India gives the details of the progress of the works and further states that Package I is expected to be completed by May 2024, whereas, Package II is expected to be completed by December 2024. Paragraph 5 of the Affidavit filed by the National Highways Authority of India is extracted herein below :-

¶28

“5. As per the assurance given Package I is expected to be completed by May 2024 and Package II is expected to be completed by December 2024.”

¶29

Thus, as per the said averments contained in the Affidavit filed by the National Highways Authority of India, the stretch of the National Highway-66 comprises in Package I and Package II are to be completed by December 2024.

¶30

3 of 5

¶31

Mugdha

¶32

4 12-PIL 19-21 @ IA 3427-23 @ CP 474-21.doc

¶33

Learned Government Pleader has stated that apart from aforesaid two Packages, where construction has been undertaken by the National Highways Authority of India, the road widening contains ten more Packages, which are under construction by the State Public Works Department and out of these ten Packages, work in three Packages has been completed and in rest of the seven Packages, it shall be completed by 31^st December 2024. The said statement by learned Government Pleader has been made on the basis of Affidavit sworn in by Trupti Brijlal Nag, the Superintending Engineer, National Highway Circle, Navi Mumbai, who is present in Court as well.

¶34

Thus, we dispose of the Writ Petition with the direction that the entire stretch of the road in question, i.e., National Highway-66 shall be completed in all respects including road widening and repair works, by 31^st December 2024. This direction has been given on the basis of assurances contained in the Affidavits filed by the National Highways Authority of India and the State Public Works Department and, accordingly any deviation, in the form of any delay, in the timeline as aforesaid

¶35

4 of 5

¶36

Mugdha

¶37

5 12-PIL 19-21 @ IA 3427-23 @ CP 474-21.doc

¶38

may be viewed by the Court seriously, which may amount to contempt of court.

¶39

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Public Interest Litigation Petition is finally disposed of.

¶40

Since the Petition is being disposed of finally by this order in terms of the undertaking given by the National Highways Authority of India and the State Public Works Department, the Contempt Petition also stands disposed of.

¶41

Interim Applications, if any, shall also stand disposed

¶42

of.

¶43

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶44

(CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶45

5 of 5

¶46

Mugdha

Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar v. the Union of India, Thr the Secretary/Chief Engineer, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway and or

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar v. the Union of India, Thr the Secretary/Chief Engineer, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway and or

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Ramnath Tiwari Vs Budhiraj Ramnath Tiwari Since Deceased through Heirs and Ors.

M/S. Girish Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation through City Engineer and Ors.

Chandra Shekhar Export Pvt. Ltd. through Manager Jayant Shivpal Banachhode vs Babanraoji Shinde Sugar and Allied Industries Ltd. through Ranjitsinh Babanrao Shinde

Manjula Biswas vs the Union of India

Bhagvanji Raiyani vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Mr. Owais Anwar Pechkar Vs the Union of India and Ors.