be noticed that though this experience is in respect of 85 MLD capacity Sewage Treatment Plant, however, the duration is only six months i.e., from 14th June, 2019 to 31st December, 2019. This certificate, thus, clearly does not evidence that this work was for a period of continuous three years and hence, such work cannot be taken into account for the purposes of reckoning the experience in terms of the experience clause in the tender conditions. Similarly, the certificate dated 7th October, 2019 is in respect of a period of less than three years, to be specific, for a period of one year and three months only. This certificate also shows that it is not in relation to 85 MLD capacity Sewage Treatment Plant neither does it disclose that it was in respect of operation and maintenance of the Sewage Treatment Plant, rather what it discloses is that the work related to “Designing Providing, Constructing, Erecting and Commissioning of 2 MLD capacity high tech Sewage Treatment Plant”. Though it states that the work relating to treatment of the domestic raw sewage will also have to be performed, however, since this work is in relation to a Sewage Treatment Plant of only 2 MLD capacity which is much less than 40% of the total average capacity of 37.5 MLD, hence, such experience, as evidenced by the certificate dated 7th October, 2019, also cannot be taken into consideration for counting the experience of the petitioner to consider it to have technically qualified. Thus, the petitioner neither fulfills the alternative experience Clause-1 nor does it fulfill the alternative experience Clause-3 of the tender condition No. 10(ii).
