Vikas K Saliyan v. Ram Karan Yadav
Case brief
What is this about?
Mention hearing in a civil petition. The court adjourned the matter due to paucity of time.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONT. PETITION NO. 471 OF 2024
Vikas K Saliyan ....PETITIONER
V/S
Ram Karan Yadav
....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P. COLABAWALLA & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, JJ DATE : 12th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 30/01/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vikas K Saliyan
- respondent
Ram Karan Yadav
Coram
B.P. Colabawalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court