In a contempt petition seeking discharge upon finalized payment of subsistence allowance, a Bench allowed a statement by counsel that the allowance was paid and the petition holds no merit.
Discharge of notice and dismissal of the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-CP-213-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 213 OF 2024
Varshrani Vijaykumar Nanna ...Petitioner Versus Shri Shantilingeshwar Shikshanprasarak Sansatha ...Respondent
Mr. Samir Kumbhakoni, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Pranita Hingmire, for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2024
P.C.:
makes a statement that the subsistence allowance has been paid and nothing survives in this Petition. Accepting the statement, the notice is discharged. Petition is dismissed.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADARDate: Sajakali Jamadar JAMADAR 2024.08.02 17:22:44 +0530
1 of 1
Varshrani Vijaykumar Nanna
Shri Shantilingeshwar Shikshanprasarak Sansatha
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
