Contempt petition arising from a writ petition; certain petitioners settled disputes with Respondent No.4 and sought to withdraw. Court permitted deletion of Petitioner Nos.1, 9 and 14 from the array within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BGP (21)-CONPW-70-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.70 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2294 OF 2023
Ahmad Dawood Surve & Ors. … Petitioners
V/s.
The Maharashtra Housing And
BALAJIGOVINDRAOPANCHAL Digitally signedby BALAJIGOVINDRAOPANCHALDate:2024.12.0411:13:00+0530
Area Development Authority & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Amol Gatne, for Petitioners. Mr. Girish Utangale a/w Saurabh Utangale, for Respondent Nos.1 & 2. Ms. Uma Palsuledesai, for Respondent No.3 – SRA. Mr. Viraj Parikh i/by Payal Dalvi, for Respondent No.4.
Mr. Deepak Shukla a/w Satsang Tailor i/by BNS Legal, for the Applicants in Interim Application (e-filing).
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 29th November 2024.
P.C. :
submitted that the Petitioner Nos.1, 9 and 14 have settled their disputes with the Respondent No.4 and have addressed letters to the Registry of this Court requesting it to allow them to withdraw the proceedings qua them. One of such letters is annexed at page No.21 to the Interim Application bearing E- filing No.AMH 2021005/815C 202400012.
1/2
BGP (21)-CONPW-70-24.doc
delete Petitioner No.1, 9 and 14 from the array of Petitioners.
The amendment be carried out within a period of two weeks
from today.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
2/2
Ahmad Dawood Surve & Ors.
The Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority
SRA
Respondent No.4
A. S. Gadkari
Kamal Khata
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
