Disposed

Ratilal Madan Waja v. Rajesh Kumar the Additional Secretary, Revenue Department

Bombay HC5 Aug 2024CONPW/69/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition alleging disobedience of an earlier writ court order regarding conversion of Class-II Occupancies to Class-I. State stated the order dated 22 December 2023 was complied with by a final order dated 13 December 2024; the Collector tendered unconditional apology, which was accepted, and the contempt petition was disposed of.

What the court decided

AI extract

Ratilal Madan Waja vs Rajesh Kumar the Additional… — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

17-CONPW-69-2024.doc

¶2

Arjun

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.69 OF 2024 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2742 OF 2024

¶6

ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR

¶7

Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2024.12.18 03:14:53 +0530

¶8

Ratilal Madan Waja …Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

Rajesh Kumar, The Additional Secretary, …Respondents (Revenue Department), Government of Maharashtra & Ors.

¶11

Mr. Abbas Zaidy a/w Aditya A. Kavale i/b Zohair & Co., for the Petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Abhay L. Patki, Addl. GP a/w Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP, for the Respondent No.1.

¶13

Mr. Purshottam Thorat, Naib Tahsildar, present.

¶14

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED: 17 DECEMBER 2024

¶15

P.C.:

¶16

The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the Judgment and Order dated 22nd December 2023 passed in Writ Petition No.2742 of 2024.

¶17

This Court by earlier Order dated 23rd September 2024 has recorded the statement of Mr. Patki, learned Additional GP made on

¶18

behalf of the Respondent – State that the directions as contained in

¶19

Paragraph No.12 of the said Order dated 22nd December 2023 have

¶20

been complied with and time was sought to comply with the directions

¶21

¶22

17-CONPW-69-2024.doc

¶23

as contained in Paragraph No.13 of the said Order dated 22nd December 2023.

¶24

Mr. Patki, learned Additional GP states that the final Order has been passed on 13th December 2024 and accordingly direction as contained in Paragraph No.13 of the said Order has also been complied with.

¶25

Mr. Abbas Zaidy, learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the final Order passed on 13th December 2024 is not strictly in accordance with the said Order dated 22nd December 2023. He states that in the last Paragraph of said Order dated 13th December 2024, it is stated that the said Order is subject to Notification dated 8th March 2019. However, Mr. Patki, learned Additional GP, on instructions, states that the said last Paragraph is added in all the Orders by which Class – II Occupancies are converted into Class – I Occupancies. Thus, the Petitioner, if aggrieved by said Order dated 13th December 2024, can challenge the same in appropriate proceedings, however the position on record shows that the said Order dated 22nd December 2023 is complied with.

¶26

As the said Order is complied with and Mr. Rajendra Shankar Kshirsagar, the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District has tendered unconditional apology, no further Orders are required in the Contempt Petition. The said apology is accepted.

¶27

¶28

17-CONPW-69-2024.doc

¶29

Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.

¶30

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶31

Ratilal Madan Waja v. Rajesh Kumar the Additional Secretary, Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ratilal Madan Waja v. Rajesh Kumar the Additional Secretary, Revenue Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Pushpalata S. Sharma vs Brij Madanlal Sharma and Ors.

Babasaheb Jaywant Wakde vs the Grievance Redressal Committee

Chief Executive Officer Zilla Parishad Satara and Ors. vs Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Mumbai Thr Its Superintending Er and Anr.

East and West Builders vs State of Maharashtra

Cynthia Pinheiro vs the District Deputy Registrar

Atlantic Construction Co. vs State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader