Lata Umakant Patil and 2 Ors. v. Naumi Developers through Their Authorized Partner
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition listed for hearing; the respondent's counsel sought an adjournment citing unavailability of the arguing counsel, and the court adjourned the matter to a later date.
What the court decided
33-CONP-21-2024+.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 21 of 2024
IN
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4411 OF 2022
Lata Umakant Patil & Ors …Petitioners Versus
Naumi Developers Through Their Authorised …Respondent Partner
Mr Pravin Tembhekar , for the Petitioners.
Mr Chirag Sarawgi , with Riya T, i/b Tushar Goradia, for the Respondent.
CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J
DATED: 29th November 2024.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lata Umakant Patil & Ors
- respondent
Naumi Developers Through Their Authorised Partner
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court