Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with earlier directions; petitioner's counsel stated on instructions that respondents had paid the amount directed by the order dated 9 May 2024, and the court disposed of the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35-CONP-8-2024 (OS).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 8 OF 2024 IN
INTERIM APPLICATION(ST) NO. 18903 OF 2023
Nihar Dilip Gondalia ...Petitioner Versus
Texel Industires Limited ...Respondent
Mr. Robin Fernandes a/w Mr. Sukrit Parashar Ms. Adrianna Lillyan Thangkhiew i/by Vesta Legal for Petitioner.
ETHAPEDNYANESHWARASHOK Digitally signedby ETHAPEDNYANESHWARASHOKDate: 2024.08.0810:56:34 +0530
Ms. Nidhi Mistry i/by I. V. Merchant and Company for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 7th AUGUST 2024
PC.:
submits that the Respondents have complied with the directions
contained in the order dated 9th May 2024 and the amount
indicated therein has been paid.
compliance, the Contempt Petition may be disposed of.
1 of 2
D.A.ETHAPE
35-CONP-8-2024 (OS).doc
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
2 of 2
D.A.ETHAPE
Nihar Dilip Gondalia
Texel Industires Limited
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
