Vbg Reality LLP v. Ms Maa Ashapura Developers
Case brief
What is this about?
Commercial summary suit adjourned; defendant's vakalatnama not reflected due to technical error, interim application listed with suit.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- COMSS 17-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 17 OF 2024
VBG Reality LLP ...Plaintiff V/s. Ms. Maa Ashapura Developers ...Defendant
Ms. Prakruti Joshi i/b Druve Liladhar and Co.for the Plaintiff.
CORAM : ABHAY AHUJA, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2024
P.C. :
- Ms. Joshi, learned Counsel appears for the Plaintiff and submits that although this matter has been circulated seeking ex-parte decree as no appearance was entered on behalf of the Defendant within the period of ten days in accordance with the provisions of order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, however, the Plaintiff has recently been served with the Interim Application on behalf of the Defendants that due to technical error vakalatnama filed within a period of ten days was not reflecting.
Digitally signed by NIKITA NIKITA YOGESH YOGESH GADGIL GADGIL Date: 2024.10.01 15:13:03 +0530
- Ms. Joshi submits that the said Interim Application has been listed on 7th October, 2024 and that the matter be accordingly adjourned.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VBG Reality LLP
- respondent
Ms. Maa Ashapura Developers
Coram
Abhay Ahuja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court