Danish Majid Solkar v. Majid Adam Solkar and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim adjournment order in a commercial appeal from order: time granted to respondents' counsel to file affidavit-in-reply and the appeal was stood over to the next date of listing.
What the court decided
Diksha Rane 33. COMAO 20-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 20 OF 2024 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 19 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15569 OF 2024 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 20 OF 2024
DANISH MAJID SOLKAR ..APPELLANT VS. MAJID ADAM SOLKAR &ORS. ..RESPONDENTS
Mr. R. D. Suryawanshi for appellant/applicant. Mr. S. C. Mangle for the respondent no.1. Mr. P. J. Das i/b. Mr. M. P. Dalvi for respondent nos.2 and 3.
-----------CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ DATE : 10th DECEMBER 2024.
P.C. :
1. Time is granted to the learned counsel for the respondents to file affidavit-in-reply.
2. Stand over to 8th January 2025.
[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ]
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Danish Majid Solkar
- respondent
Majid Adam Solkar
Coram
Rajesh S. Patil
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Cajetan D Souza Alias Caetano D Souza Vs Lamartina De Rocha Since Deceased through Legal Heir
Shree Salasar Cargo Movers vs the Union of India through the Divisional Railway Manager
Thakur Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Shree Salasar Cargo Movers vs the Union of India through the Divisional Railway Manager