) Mr. Vikas Kumbhar i/b. P. V. Nichani and ) Company, Advocate for the applicant. ) ) P.C. : The present Chamber Order is taken out for ) setting aside Order dated 11.07.2023, ) rejecting captioned Petition under O.S.Rule ) 986 for non-compliance of office objections. ) ) Ld. Advocate for the applicant tenders ) Affidavit of Service, showing service of ) Chamber Order upon the respondents, which ) is taken on file. Despite service, none ) appeared for the respondents. ) ) Ld. Advocate for the applicant made a ) statement that valuation of the captioned Suit ) is more than Rs. 10 crores and therefore, the ) present Chamber Order is maintainable before ) this Authority. Statement is accepted. ) ) Heard ld. Advocate for the applicant. Perused ) Affidavit of the applicant. It is contended that ) the Ld. Advocate was not aware about passing ) of Conditional Order dated 11.07.2023 in the ) captioned suit, however, clerk of Ld. Advocate ) informed that office objections were complied ) with. Today, ld. Advocate for the applicant ) submits that now, he will pursue with the ) captioned suit diligently if it is restored to file. ) ) In the present matter, since none appeared for ) the respondents, contention raised in the ) Affidavit remains uncontested. Therefore, in ) the interest of justice, I am of the view that ) one opportunity is required to be given to the ) applicant to pursue with the captioned Suit. ) Hence, the present Chamber Order is granted ) as prayed and signed separately.
