Writ petitions dismissed for non-prosecution after neither the petitioner nor its advocates appeared despite prior warning; connected chamber orders disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
409.WP.510-2021.DOCX
Pradnya
2024:BHC-OS:18626-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 510 OF 2021 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3001 OF 2024 WITH CHAMBER ORDER NO. 183 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3001 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2574 OF 2019 WITH CHAMBER ORDER NO. 182 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2574 OF 2019 Aditya Enterprises …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors. … Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Ms Jyoti Chavan, Addl.G.P. , for the Respondent-State in WP/510/2021 and WP/3001/2024.
Ms Varsha Sawant, AGP , for the Respondent-State in CHOL/183/2024 and WPL/2574/2019.
CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. DATED: 18 November 2024
Page 1 of 2
409.WP.510-2021.DOCX
PC:-
“1. Neither the representatives of the Petitioner nor their advocates are present. Ms Vrushali Kabre, learned AGP appears for the State.
(Jitendra Jain, J)
(M.S. Sonak, J)
Signed by: Pradnya Bhogale Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/11/2024 16:54:26
Page 2 of 2
Aditya Enterprises
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
M.S. Sonak
Jitendra Jain
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
