Disposed

M/S Narayanlal Mannalal Agrawal v. State of Maha., Thr. Secy. (Food), Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Oct 2024CAW/2870/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur allowed a civil application for intervention in Writ Petition No. 2386 of 2024. The Court permitted the applicant to intervene as respondent no. 8 and ordered necessary amendments to the records.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant permitted to intervene as respondent no. 8 with necessary amendments.

M/S Narayanlal Mannalal Agrawal Vs State of Maha… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:12051-DB

¶2

1 3) WP 2386-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 2386 OF 2024

¶5

M/S NARAYANLAL MANNALAL AGRAWAL THR. PARTNER SHRI VINOD KUMAR NARAYANLAL AGRAWAL

¶6

...Vs...

¶7

STATE OF MAHA., THR. SECY. (FOOD), CIVIL SUPPLY AND CONSUMER PROTECTION DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

Shri A.A.Naik, Senior Advocate a/b. Shri A.S. Dabadghao, Advocate for petitioner.

¶10

Shri N.R. Rode, AGP for respondentS/State.

¶11

Shri S.S.Deshpande, Advocate for respondent no. 7. Ms. Aarti Singh, Advocate for respondent no. 4. Shri A.D. Ghare, Advocate for respondent no. 8 (Intervenor)

¶12

CORAM: AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND

¶13

SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, JJ.

¶14

DATED : 24^th OCTOBER, 2024.

¶15

Mr. Naik, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits, that in terms of the policy, the petitioner be permitted to apply, as the Committee has liberty to reject the allotment of the work to any person, who does not satisfy the criteria for shortest distance from the Paddy Procurement Center, keeping in mind the principle of least costs. The last date for submitting such application is till 2.00 p.m. on 25/10/2024, considering the same, the petitioner is permitted to submit an application to the Committee in terms of the advertisement, who shall consider it strictly in terms of the Government Resolution (G.R.) dated 24/11/2023.

¶16

2 3) WP 2386-2024.odt

¶17

List the matter on 11/11/2024 for further consideration.

¶18

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2870 OF 2024

¶19

The present civil application for intervention is tendered across the bar.

¶20

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

¶21

The applicant is permitted to intervene in the matter as respondent no. 8.

¶22

The necessary amendment to be carried out.

¶23

(SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶24

B.T.Khapekar

M/S Narayanlal Mannalal Agrawal v. State of Maha., Thr. Secy. (Food), Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Narayanlal Mannalal Agrawal v. State of Maha., Thr. Secy. (Food), Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saurabh S/O Shalikram Sahare Vs Sumant Bhange, Secretary, Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. Govt. of Maha., Mumbai and or

Kailash Virchand Bangade Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary for Rural Development Dept., Mumbai and Another

Prabhakar Suryabhan Meshram Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station Panchpaoli, Nagpur

Ramesh S/O Shamrao Kumbhare Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Another

Pawan Devidas Dhakde vs Commissioner, Health Services and Mission Director, National Health Mission, Mumbai and Ors.

Nitin Vinayakrarrao Misale Vs Dr. Sadhana Tayade, Director of Health, Health Services and Others