Chunnilal S/O Hariji Pardhi and Others v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. for the State of Maha., Mumbai and Ors.

Bombay HC4 Oct 2024CAW/2674/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a procedural order listing the next date of hearing. The court allowed an application for intervention by the Navjyot Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, impleaded them as respondents, and directed amendment of the writ petition. The matter is listed for further hearing.

What the court decided

AI extract

Chunnilal S/O Hariji Pardhi and Others Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. for the State of Maha., Mumbai and Ors. — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 2251 OF 2024

¶4

( Chunnilal S/o Hariji Pardhi and others vs. State of Maharashtra and others )

¶5

Mr. K.J.Topale, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. J.Y.Ghurde, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶6

Mr. S.M.Vaishnav, Advocate for intervenor.

¶7

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 04, 2024

¶8

CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 2674/2024

¶9

Mr.Vaishnav, has taken out an application for intervention on behalf of Navjyot Shikshan Prasarak Mandal through its Secretary and the Headmaster of Shiv Sai Anudanit Aadivasi Aashram Shala, Janefal, Taluka Mehkar, District Buldhana. According to him, the challenge to the Government Resolution dated 04/12/2023 issued by the Tribal Development Department by the petition, was in respect of the School run by respondent No.5, which is transferred to the Navjyot Shikshan Prasarak Mandal.

¶10

The application for intervention make out a ground for the applicants to intervene in the present petition and even the Counsel for petitioner expresses ‘no objection’ in that regard.

¶11

In the wake of the above, the intervention application is allowed. The intervenor shall be impleaded as respondents in the petition by effecting necessary amendment.

¶12

¶13

Let the petition be amended within a period of one week from today. Learned Counsel Mr.Vaishnav, waives service of notice for newly added respondents.

¶14

Learned Counsel Mr.Vaishnav on instructions submits that in the two writ petitions listed before the Court which comprises 20 petitioners, out of which 10 petitioners are already absorbed and he make a categorical statement that the respondent No.6 is ready to accommodate the balance petitioners in the respondent No.7 School.

¶15

It is therefore, now for the petitioners either to accept this offer or continue with their challenge in the writ petition.

¶16

Re-notify to 22/10/2024 .

¶17

( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) ( BHARATI DANGRE, J. )

¶18

KOLHE

Chunnilal S/O Hariji Pardhi and Others v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. for the State of Maha., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Chunnilal S/O Hariji Pardhi and Others v. State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. for the State of Maha., Mumbai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

O.L.R High of Bombay, Bench Nagpur and Akola Oil Industries Ltd.,( in Liquidation) Nagpur Vs Suresh Shrimohan Bajoria

Sahil S/O Narayan Dodke Vs Vice-Chairman/ Member Secretary, S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and Anr.

Aryan S/O Naresh Shende Vs State of Maha., Thr. Principal Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Sindhu Education Society, Nagpur Thr. Its Secy., Shri. Deepak Bajaj and Another vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy., Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Ors.

Ku. Sanjeevani Dhanraj Rajwade Vs Medical Counseling Committee Thr. Dy. Director Gen. (Medical Education), New Delhi and Ors.

Ishwari Kailas Kawane Vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Medical Education and Medicine Dept., Mumbai and Ors.