Allowed

G.T.N. Industries Ltd. through Its Authorised Officer, Shri Hemant S/O Keshavrao Mitkar v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Rural Development, Mumbai and 3 Others

Bombay HC10 Dec 2024CAW/2636/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil application seeking release of a bank guarantee deposited under a stay order in a writ petition concerning disputed Gram Panchayat taxes. The court allowed release, subject to payment of arrears if decided against the applicant by the Divisional Commissioner.

What did the court decide?

Bank guarantee deposited with the Registry ordered to be released in favour of the applicant-petitioner at the earliest.

G.T.N. Industries Ltd. through Its Authorised Officer, Shri Hemant S/O Keshavrao Mitkar Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Rural Development, Mumbai and 3 Others — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 caw 2636.2024.odt

¶2

2024:BHC-NAG:13453

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

¶4

Civil Application (CAW) No. 2636 of 2024

¶5

¶6

Writ Petition No. 6577 of 2013 (D)

¶7

[G.T.N. Industries Ltd., H.O. at Hyderabad and Factory Unit at Khurajgaon, Tah. Saoner, Dist. Nagpur acting through its authorised Officer Shri H. K. Mitkar ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Rural Development and ors.]

¶8

- - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

- - - - Mr. S. M. Patrikar, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner Mr. A. A. Madiwale, AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 4 Mr. Majid Sheikh, Advocate for respondent no. 2 Mr V. A. Dhabe, Advocate for respondent no. 3

¶10

CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.

¶11

DATED : 10-12-2024

¶12

Heard.

¶13

The request of the applicant - petitioner is to permit it to withdraw original bank guarantee deposited with the Registry of this Court in terms of order dated 25-6-2014.

¶14

The petition has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 30-7-2024. The matter has been relegated back to the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur to decide it afresh.

¶15

The issue was as regards payment of taxes by the applicant – petitioner to the respondent no. 3, Gram Panchayat. My attention is invited to order dated 25-6-2014 passed by this Court in the writ petition, wherein while granting stay to the impugned order, this Court directed applicant – petitioner to furnish bank guarantee for the disputed amount of taxes, amounting to

¶16

2 caw 2636.2024.odt

¶17

Rs. 45,60,471/-. Accordingly, bank guarantee has been deposited with the Registry.

¶18

Learned counsel for Zilla Parishad and Gram Panchayat as also learned Assistant Government Pleader have objected to release the bank guarantee, the reason being the arrears of taxes are payable by the applicantpetitioner.

¶19

I do not find any reason to withhold the bank guarantee. The petition has been disposed of. The arrears of taxes is subject matter before the Divisional Commissioner. I am informed that the decision is likely to be taken within a week or so. If the decision is so taken, the applicant – petitioner shall pay the arrears of taxes as decided by the Divisional Commissioner within one month from the date of order, if it is not inclined to challenge the said order.

¶20

The application is accordingly allowed. The bank guarantee deposited by the applicant - petitioner with the Registry be released in his favour at the earliest.

¶21

The application is disposed of in above terms.

¶22

(Anil L. Pansare, J.)

¶23

wasnik

G.T.N. Industries Ltd. through Its Authorised Officer, Shri Hemant S/O Keshavrao Mitkar v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Rural Development, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.T.N. Industries Ltd. through Its Authorised Officer, Shri Hemant S/O Keshavrao Mitkar v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Rural Development, Mumbai and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pravin Vasanta Mankar Vs Eknath Vithoba Deotale and Others

Deorao S/O Hagruji Meshram Vs the Estate Manager, Nagpur Housing and Area Development Board and 3 Others

Vijaykumar S/O Ramdas Patil Vs the Estate Manager, Nagpur Housing and Area Development Board and 3 Others

Sudam Narayanrao Ningurkar vs Shyam Narayanrao Ningurkar and Others

Amravati District Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Thr. Chief Executive Officer, Amravati and Anr. Vs Pradeep S/O Radheshyam Chandak

Bhartiya Vikas Shikshan Sanstha, Nagpur through Secretary and Another Vs Aruna W/O Shailendra Renghe and Another